Company knowledge
Find and explain information from approved documents and procedures.
Kreluna Core introduces AI through a controlled, step-by-step approach: define the need, use authorised sources and produce results people can review.
Kreluna is in active development. Early access, feature availability and integration coverage are confirmed individually for each request.
Find and explain information from approved documents and procedures.
Prepare drafts, summaries and analysis while retaining human review.
Connect gradually to existing tools where supported by the provider.
Kreluna is designed to support research, planning, comparison, drafting and structured problem-solving. Straightforward questions can be handled directly, while demanding tasks can be broken into assumptions and options for review.
Define the business need, authorised sources, reviewers and a measurable outcome. Kreluna confirms feature and integration availability before any workflow is activated.
No. It can prepare analysis and content, while accountable people review important outputs and decide what happens next.
Only data and documents the organisation is permitted to use and that fall within the agreed scope.
Compatibility with each product is checked before a connection or pilot is confirmed.
Every project starts with a defined objective, authorised information and a clear review process. Capabilities are enabled progressively and important actions remain subject to approval.
A useful project starts with real work and authorised information, not an empty chat box. These are workflows to assess, not claims that every feature is already available.
Search approved procedures, manuals and documents while showing the internal source and respecting role-based access.
Prepare account briefs and follow-up drafts from authorised CRM data while leaving price, terms and sending to the responsible person.
Classify incoming files, extract fields for checking and flag missing information before anything reaches the official system of record.
Route requests, suggest answers from approved content and escalate sensitive or unusual cases to the right operator.
The choice between rules, conventional automation and AI follows observation of the workflow. Not every problem needs generative AI and not every step should be automated.
Describe the problem, who performs the work today and which observable result should improve.
Identify sources, permissions, manual hand-offs, unusual cases and points where a person must decide.
Run the pilot on authorised sample data against acceptance criteria agreed before the test.
Compare the workflow with its baseline, then extend, revise or stop it on evidence rather than enthusiasm.
CRM, ERP, email and internal repositories can only be connected through authorised interfaces and suitable permissions. Feasibility is confirmed against the real system.
Value depends on the baseline. Measures are agreed before the pilot and interpreted alongside quality, risk and exceptions.
Time from incoming request to completion, including waiting and review.
Tasks returned because information, rules or quality requirements were missing.
Outputs that can be traced to current, authorised business information.
Cases that require escalation or a fully manual route, and why they occur.
Choose frequent, bounded and checkable work with accessible data and a named owner. Clarify an unstable or ownerless process before automating it.
The proposed goal is to remove repetitive preparation and improve hand-offs. Decisions, exceptions and accountability remain with defined people.
Sources, integrations, risk and acceptance criteria. Kreluna defines scope before making a proposal and does not publish unsupported estimates here.
The AI Act and GDPR can apply together: duties and safeguards depend on the organisation’s role, the data and the system’s actual use. Assessment therefore comes before configuration.
These sources help frame the work; they do not replace legal, privacy or security advice for a specific situation.