KrelunaMatters and documents
Search, summarise and organise material within an authorised scope.
Kreluna ecosystem
AI for law firms, with professional judgement in control
Kreluna Office supports preparation and coordination without replacing legal judgment. Sources, outputs and important actions remain reviewable by authorised professionals.
Kreluna is in active development. Early access, feature availability and integration coverage are confirmed individually for each request.
Support for legal workflows
Drafts and deadlines
Prepare text and tasks for review by the responsible professional.
Access controls
Define roles, permissions and approvals around the firm’s organisation.
Prepare legal work without delegating judgment
Potential uses include searching authorised materials, summarising documents, organising matters and preparing drafts. Every result should be checked against the relevant source material.
- Sources and citations require review
- No automated legal advice
- Lawyer approval before use
Confidentiality, roles and scope
Before documents or systems are connected, the purpose, permissions and authorised people are defined. Sensitive client information should not be included in an initial enquiry.
- Role-based access
- Approval for important actions
- Connections confirmed case by case
Frequently asked questions
Does Kreluna provide legal advice?
No. It may support preparatory work, while lawyers verify sources, reasoning and conclusions.
How are inaccurate citations avoided?
Sources must remain identifiable and every reference should be checked before use in legal work or client communication.
Should matters be emailed during an enquiry?
No. A secure channel, permissions, scope and safeguards should be agreed first.
Built around control and clarity
Every project starts with a defined objective, authorised information and a clear review process. Capabilities are enabled progressively and important actions remain subject to approval.
- Defined scope and responsibilities
- Human review for important actions
- Clear limits and measurable outcomes
Practical applications
Prepare legal work without delegating judgement
The workflows support organisation and review. They are not legal advice, guaranteed case-law research or a replacement for authorised legal databases.
Intake and matter file
Structure initial information, classify attachments and flag points to clarify before the lawyer assesses the engagement.
Source-linked chronology
Extract dates and events while retaining the source passage the lawyer must verify.
Comparison and summary
Highlight differences, clauses or themes in an authorised corpus without treating a summary as a final interpretation.
Controlled drafts
Prepare structures or communications from approved templates with visible sources, status and reviewer.
Project method
Demonstrate source, passage and review
A credible pilot uses synthetic data or an authorised matter and measures whether each assertion can be traced back. An unverified citation blocks use of the output.
- Define the outcome
Describe the problem, who performs the work today and which observable result should improve.
- Map data and exceptions
Identify sources, permissions, manual hand-offs, unusual cases and points where a person must decide.
- Test a narrow scope
Run the pilot on authorised sample data against acceptance criteria agreed before the test.
- Measure and decide
Compare the workflow with its baseline, then extend, revise or stop it on evidence rather than enthusiasm.
Data and accountability
Matter-level confidentiality and privilege
Access, retention, deletion and providers are assessed before upload. The lawyer remains responsible for facts, law, strategy, communications and filings.
- Limit access to the authorised matter team
- No client files in an initial sales enquiry
- Check citations against the authorised or official source
- Label outputs as drafts until approval
- Maintain an internal policy for permitted and prohibited use
Measuring value
Observable quality in preparatory work
The measure is not pages produced but verifiable work delivered to the lawyer without disproportionate risk.
Traceable statements
Assertions linked to the correct document or authorised source.
Material omissions
Important events or documents missed against human review.
Review time
Time required to check and correct the output.
Correct access
No information drawn from out-of-scope matters or users.
Before you begin
Confidentiality and reliability
Does Kreluna provide legal advice?
No. The support described concerns preparation and organisation; legal interpretation, advice and strategy remain with the lawyer.
How are fabricated citations controlled?
The workflow must require authorised sources and human verification. If a reference cannot be confirmed, the output must not be used.
Can I send a matter file for a demo?
No. Use general information for the first enquiry. Any sample is agreed only after roles, legal basis, security and scope are defined.
References for responsible design
The AI Act and GDPR can apply together: duties and safeguards depend on the organisation’s role, the data and the system’s actual use. Assessment therefore comes before configuration.
- European Artificial Intelligence ActOfficial text of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
- EDPB Opinion 28/2024 on AI modelsAnonymity, legal basis and consequences of unlawful personal-data processing.
- EDPB — Data protection by design and by defaultSME guidance on safeguards, minimisation and accountability.
- OWASP — LLM Prompt Injection PreventionRisks and defences for AI applications connected to documents and tools.
- CCBE — Technical guide on the use of AI tools by lawyersEuropean guidance on confidentiality, competence, supervision and responsible use by lawyers.
These sources help frame the work; they do not replace legal, privacy or security advice for a specific situation.